The Key to Achieving a Positive Outcome
DUI & Traffic Offenses
If you are arrested and charged with drinking and driving or another traffic violation, it is critical to consult an attorney as soon as possible. Our team of highly qualified DUI lawyers is available in Atlantic City, NJ and throughout South Jersey to help you deal with your municipal court charges. Weinstock Defense is a highly-respected New Jersey defense firm – we will do everything in our power to reduce fines, save your license, and prevent prison time.
Weinstock Defense has decades of experience
fighting DUI charges throughout New Jersey.
DUI charges can carry serious consequences, including jail time. But don’t lose hope or face the system alone: our DUI lawyers have handled thousands of cases like yours. At Weinstock Defense, we have proven strategies to discredit charges. We know the signs of errors by the arresting officer, such as:
- Improper calibration or use of a breath test device
- Incorrect assessment of field sobriety tests
- Lack of probable cause to pull over your vehicle
We will attack any weaknesses in the prosecutor’s case to get your DUI charges reduced or dismissed. And since we have a high success rate for getting cases dropped, we never hesitate to fight.
Aside from DUIs, Weinstock Defense handles the following traffic offenses:
- Causing injury in an auto accident
- Reckless driving
- Driving without a valid driver’s license
- Illegal lane change
- Improper passing
- Failure to yield
Traffic tickets can lead to expensive surcharges or license suspension, depending on the number of points you have on your driving record. Getting a suspended license back in New Jersey is difficult—but we understand the court system and will aggressively advocate for you.
State v. A.G. – Driving While Intoxicated – Case Dismissed. A.G. was charged with driving while intoxicated. Mr. Weinstock demonstrated that A.G. was not operating the vehicle at the time of her arrest. Mr. Weinstock also was able to have her statement suppressed because law enforcement failed to read her the Miranda warning. The judge dismissed the case.
State v. B.S. – Driving While Intoxicated – Case Dismissed. B.S. was charged with driving while intoxicated even though she had a blood alcohol reading below the legal limit. The state alleged that she was under the influence of narcotics at the time. Mr. Weinstock successfully argued that there was insufficient proof that B.S. was under the influence and attacked the credibility of the state’s drug recognition expert. The judge dismissed the case.
State v. J.S. – Driving While Intoxicated – Case Dismissed. J.S. was charged with driving while intoxicated even though he had a blood alcohol reading below the legal limit – the state alleged that he was under the influence of narcotics at the time. Mr. Weinstock successfully argued that there was insufficient proof that B.S. was under the influence of any foreign substance. The judge dismissed the case.
State v. T.T. – Driving While Intoxicated – Case Dismissed. T.T. faced a driving while intoxicated charge. Mr. Weinstock demonstrated that T.T. was not the operator of the vehicle and that the state would not be able to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. A judge dismissed the case.